Answer :
A) (d) Assertion is wrong but Reason is correct.
Explanation: The Vice-President CAN vote, in case their is any TIE! But this statement states that The Vice-President and Chairman CANNOT VOTE IN ANY ISSUE. So this will be FALSE!
B) (c) Assertion is correct but Reason is False.
Explanation: The Reason states that IN INDIA THE HEAD OF STATES IS HEREDITARY, this system had been neglected from a long period of time. Now Heads are elected by Free and Fair ELECTIONS! So this statement will be FALSE!
[tex]
\bf \red{Hope \: it \: helped \: you!}
\\ \bf \orange{Thanks}[/tex]
Answer:
a.) Assertion: The Vice-President / Chairman of Rajya Sabha cannot vote on any issue in the house.
Reason: The Vice-President is not a member of the house.
**Option (A)** is correct. Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A). The Vice-President of India, who is the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, does not vote on any issue in the house because he is not a member of the Rajya Sabha. He only has a casting vote in case of a tie.
b.) Assertion: India is a democratic state and a republic whereas England in spite of being a democracy is not a republic.
Reason: In India, the head of state is hereditary whereas in England the head of the state is an elected head from amongst the people.
**Option (C)** is correct. (A) is correct but (R) is wrong. India is a democratic republic where the head of state (the President) is elected. England (part of the United Kingdom) is a constitutional monarchy, where the head of state (the monarch) is hereditary, not elected.