Answer :
Answer:
Hii if you like this answer
the mark as Brainliest option is free to press and gives points
Nuclear power remains a contentious issue in the pursuit of clean energy. On one hand, it offers immense power generation with minimal greenhouse gas emissions, crucial for reducing reliance on fossil fuels. It provides a stable baseload supply, unaffected by weather conditions unlike solar or wind. However, nuclear plants pose inherent risks, highlighted by accidents like Chernobyl and Fukushima, raising safety concerns and the long-term impact of radioactive waste disposal. Moreover, construction and decommissioning costs are exorbitant, deterring widespread adoption. The rise of safer renewable energies like solar and wind, which have become more cost-effective and scalable, has further diminished nuclear's appeal. As we navigate towards a sustainable energy future, balancing nuclear's potential against its risks remains pivotal in shaping global energy policies.
Answer:
Nuclear power is a double-edged sword in the quest for clean energy. On the positive side, it produces minimal greenhouse gases compared to fossil fuels and provides a stable, large-scale power supply. This makes it an essential player in reducing carbon emissions and combating climate change. Additionally, advancements in reactor technology promise increased safety and efficiency.
However, nuclear energy comes with significant drawbacks. High initial costs and long development times make it a less attractive option compared to rapidly advancing renewable energy sources like wind and solar. The risk of catastrophic accidents, such as those in Chernobyl and Fukushima, coupled with the long-term challenge of radioactive waste disposal, raises serious safety and environmental concerns. As renewables become more affordable and safer, the future of nuclear power remains uncertain despite its potential benefits.